A Consumer's 13-Year Legal Battle Against Misleading Claims of 'Fair and Handsome' Cream
13 years and running: Story of a Delhi consumer’s long battle against a personal care giant’s ‘Fair and Handsome’ claim
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
Nikhil Jain from Rohini, Delhi, has been fighting a legal battle against Emami for misleading claims made by their 'Fair and Handsome' cream. After initially winning a case in 2015, the ruling was overturned, but Jain persisted, leading to a recent order directing Emami to pay damages for deceptive advertising.
- 01Nikhil Jain filed a complaint against Emami's 'Fair and Handsome' cream in 2013 after experiencing no results.
- 02In 2015, Jain won a case against Emami, which was later overturned on appeal.
- 03A recent ruling in December 2024 ordered Emami to pay ₹15 lakh (approximately $18,000 USD) in damages.
- 04The case highlights the challenges consumers face in seeking justice against large corporations.
- 05There is a significant backlog in consumer courts in Delhi, affecting timely resolution of cases.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Nikhil Jain, a 37-year-old banker from Rohini, Delhi, began his legal battle against Emami, the manufacturer of 'Fair and Handsome' cream, in 2013 after using the product without seeing any results. Jain initially won his case in 2015, with the court imposing ₹15 lakh (approximately $18,000 USD) in punitive damages on Emami and ordering the withdrawal of misleading claims. However, Emami appealed and the ruling was set aside. Jain persisted, and in December 2024, the Central District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ruled in his favor again, directing Emami to pay ₹14.5 lakh to the Delhi State Consumer Welfare Fund, ₹50,000 to Jain, and ₹10,000 in litigation costs. Emami's appeal against this ruling is ongoing, with the next hearing scheduled for April 7, 2026. Jain's case reflects the broader issues within consumer rights in India, where many consumers face difficulties in pursuing claims against large companies. Consumer commissions are struggling with high vacancy rates and a backlog of cases, which hinders timely justice. Despite these challenges, Jain's determination highlights the importance of consumer advocacy in holding corporations accountable for their claims.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Jain's case underscores the challenges consumers face in seeking justice against misleading advertising, which may deter other consumers from pursuing similar claims.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



