The Bombay High Court has determined that an election petition alleging non-disclosure of critical information in an election affidavit must not be dismissed prematurely if it presents issues that warrant a trial. This ruling arose from a petition filed by a defeated candidate from Sangamner constituency against a Shiv Sena MLA, who was accused of failing to disclose his partnership in a firm named 'Nilkamal' and outstanding tax liabilities in his Form 26 affidavit. The court found that the petition contained sufficient facts to merit further examination, particularly regarding the candidate's alleged failure to disclose government dues. The court stated that such matters are to be resolved during a trial, and the defense's claims about the dissolution of the firm could not be evaluated at this stage. The ruling underscores the importance of transparency in election affidavits and the potential impact of undisclosed liabilities on voter decisions. Ultimately, the court dismissed the application to reject the petition, allowing it to proceed for further consideration.