Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah Accuses Election Commission of Bias Over Fund Queries
ECI acting with bias: Siddaramaiah on fund disbursal queries
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah criticized the Election Commission of India (ECI) for bias after it requested details on fund disbursals for welfare schemes in constituencies facing by-elections. He defended the ongoing programs as essential commitments rather than election incentives, while accusing the ECI of selective scrutiny compared to other states.
- 01Siddaramaiah accused the ECI of bias over fund disbursal queries in poll-bound constituencies.
- 02The ECI requested details on financial transfers under ongoing welfare schemes.
- 03Siddaramaiah emphasized that the schemes are part of ongoing commitments, not election announcements.
- 04He criticized the BJP for double standards regarding welfare programs.
- 05The CM vowed to continue the welfare programs without interruption despite ECI scrutiny.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has accused the Election Commission of India (ECI) of bias after it sought details about fund disbursals under the state’s welfare schemes in constituencies preparing for by-elections on April 9. The ECI's inquiry, initiated in a letter from secretary Pawan Deewan, requested information on financial transfers and the officials responsible for authorizing these funds, citing concerns over potential violations of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC). Siddaramaiah defended the schemes, including Gruha Lakshmi and Yuva Nidhi, as ongoing commitments made during the 2023 assembly elections, asserting that they are not new announcements aimed at influencing voters. He criticized the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for its inconsistent stance on welfare programs, claiming that while the BJP condemns such initiatives as 'freebies', they replicate similar schemes in states where they govern. The chief minister expressed concern over the ECI's selective scrutiny, pointing out that cash transfer schemes in states like Maharashtra and Bihar were allowed without similar oversight. He characterized the ECI's actions as politically motivated and detrimental to the welfare of the poor and women in Karnataka, reiterating his government’s commitment to continue delivering on its promises.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The scrutiny of fund disbursals could affect the implementation of welfare programs in Karnataka, impacting citizens reliant on these benefits.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the Election Commission is biased in its scrutiny of welfare schemes?
Connecting to poll...
More about Election Commission of India
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.







