Madras High Court Protects Lawyers from Defamation Prosecution Based on Client Instructions
Don’t prosecute lawyers for statements made on client instructions, says HC
The Times Of IndiaImage: The Times Of India
The Madras High Court ruled that lawyers cannot be prosecuted for defamation regarding statements made under client instructions. This decision emphasizes that the responsibility for such statements lies with the client, not the lawyer, reinforcing the legal privilege of advocates.
- 01Lawyers are protected from defamation claims based on client instructions.
- 02The court emphasized that the truth of statements cannot be verified by lawyers.
- 03Responsibility for any defamatory statements rests with the client.
- 04The ruling quashed a defamation complaint against a lawyer in a matrimonial dispute case.
- 05The court upheld the complaint against the client's wife.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Madras High Court in Chennai, India, has ruled that lawyers cannot face defamation prosecution for statements made based on their clients' instructions. Justice G K Ilanthiraiyan stated that lawyers act as advocates for their clients and cannot verify the truth of the facts presented to them. The court's decision came while quashing a criminal defamation complaint against a lawyer involved in a matrimonial dispute. The complaint was filed by a man who alleged that his wife, with the lawyer's instigation, falsely accused him of sexual harassment under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act. The court found that any responsibility for the allegations lies with the client, not the lawyer. However, the court did not dismiss the defamation complaint against the wife, highlighting the complexity of legal responsibilities in such cases.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling clarifies the legal protections for lawyers in defamation cases, potentially encouraging them to advocate more freely on behalf of their clients without fear of legal repercussions.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you agree with the court's decision to protect lawyers from defamation claims based on client instructions?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




