Allahabad High Court Upholds Criminal Case Against Muslim Personal Law Board Chairman
HC refuses to quash criminal case against Muslim Personal Law Board UP chairman
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
The Allahabad High Court has refused to dismiss criminal proceedings against Noor Ahmed Azhari, chairman of the Muslim Personal Law Board in Uttar Pradesh, India. The case stems from allegations made in a viral video where he purportedly claimed that BJP-ruled states were intimidating Muslims and undermining the Constitution.
- 01The Allahabad High Court dismissed Noor Ahmed Azhari's plea to quash criminal proceedings.
- 02Azhari faces allegations of inciting communal feelings against the government.
- 03The FIR was filed following a viral video of Azhari's statements.
- 04The court emphasized the need for sufficient prima facie evidence at the cognizance stage.
- 05The case highlights ongoing tensions related to religious and political discourse in India.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Allahabad High Court has upheld the criminal proceedings against Noor Ahmed Azhari, the Uttar Pradesh chairman of the Muslim Personal Law Board, in response to a viral video where he allegedly claimed that states governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) were intimidating Muslims and undermining the Constitution. An FIR was filed against Azhari at the Puranpur police station in Pilibhit district, leading to a charge sheet and subsequent summons issued by the Pilibhit chief judicial magistrate court on July 24, 2024. Azhari sought to quash the proceedings under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), but Justice Saurabh Srivastava dismissed his plea on March 16. The court noted that the FIR accused Azhari of spreading religious excitement and communal feelings, potentially leading to public disturbances. During the hearing, Azhari's counsel argued that his statements were merely opinions and did not constitute an offense under Section 505(2), while the state counsel maintained that the case involved disputed facts that could not be resolved at this stage.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The court's ruling may have significant implications for religious and political discourse in Uttar Pradesh, affecting community relations and public sentiment.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe that statements made in public debates should be protected under free speech?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



