Madras High Court Faces Surge in Election-Related PILs
In time-honoured tradition, electoral PILs pile up at HC
toiImage: toi
As elections approach in Tamil Nadu, a wave of Public Interest Litigations (PILs) has inundated the Madras High Court. These petitions, often repetitive, seek to address issues like cash distribution to voters and the enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct. Most are dismissed or withdrawn, reflecting a pattern seen in previous election cycles.
- 01A surge of election-related PILs has been filed at the Madras High Court in Tamil Nadu.
- 02Common requests include stopping cash distribution to voters and enforcing the Model Code of Conduct.
- 03Many PILs are dismissed as they are deemed 'publicity litigation.'
- 04Petitioners often repeat similar claims in different election cycles.
- 05The court has already dismissed several PILs this election season.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
With the announcement of elections in Tamil Nadu, the Madras High Court is experiencing a familiar influx of Public Interest Litigations (PILs). These petitions typically seek to address concerns such as halting the distribution of cash and gifts to voters, protecting Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) from tampering, and enforcing the Model Code of Conduct (MCC). However, many of these PILs are often repetitive and lack genuine public interest, leading to their dismissal or withdrawal. For instance, on April 7, Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari rejected four PILs, including one from T Prabhakaran, who sought to postpone Indian Premier League (IPL) matches scheduled at the MA Chidambaram Stadium in Chennai. Another PIL filed by advocate M L Ravi aimed to prevent the misuse of reserved election symbols by candidates affiliated with other parties. The court has consistently dismissed petitions aimed at enforcing election regulations, branding them as 'publicity litigation.' This pattern of repetitive PILs is a recurring theme during election seasons in Tamil Nadu.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The dismissal of these PILs indicates that the court is not inclined to entertain cases that do not reflect genuine public concern, impacting how election-related issues are addressed legally.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe that Public Interest Litigations during elections serve a genuine purpose?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



