CBI Defends Justice Sharma's Role Amid Kejriwal's Recusal Request in Liquor Policy Case
Arvind Kejriwal can't seek judge's recusal because she attended ABAP seminar: CBI to High Court
Deccan Herald
Image: Deccan Herald
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has opposed former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's request for the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma from the liquor policy case. The CBI argues that attending a seminar by the Akhil Bharatiya Adhivakta Parishad does not indicate bias and that such requests could undermine judicial independence.
- 01CBI argues Justice Sharma's attendance at a seminar does not imply bias.
- 02Kejriwal claims a lack of impartiality in the case against him.
- 03The CBI warns against 'forum shopping' and frivolous recusal requests.
- 04Justice Sharma has previously ruled against Kejriwal and other accused.
- 05Judicial independence must be protected from external pressures.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed a response to former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's request for the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma from the liquor policy case. The CBI contends that Kejriwal's claim is unfounded as attending a seminar by the Akhil Bharatiya Adhivakta Parishad (ABAP) does not demonstrate any ideological bias. The agency emphasized that if such allegations were accepted, it could lead to a situation where numerous judges would need to recuse themselves from cases involving politically exposed individuals. The CBI described Kejriwal's request as an attempt to undermine the court's authority and warned that allowing such recusal requests could lead to 'forum shopping' by litigants. Kejriwal and other Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders, including Manish Sisodia and Durgesh Pathak, have expressed concerns about the impartiality of Justice Sharma, citing her previous rulings against them. The CBI's response asserts that the independence of the judiciary must be upheld and that recusal should only occur in exceptional circumstances to prevent anarchy in the adjudicatory process.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The outcome of this case could influence public perception of judicial impartiality and the handling of politically sensitive cases in India.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe judges should recuse themselves based on attendance at legal seminars?
Connecting to poll...
More about Central Bureau of Investigation

CBI to Investigate ₹590 Crore Embezzlement Case Involving IDFC First Bank
Hindustan Times • Apr 9, 2026
CBI Opposes Arvind Kejriwal's Request for Judge's Recusal in Liquor Policy Case
The Economic Times • Apr 9, 2026

Telangana High Court Delays Verdict on Kaleshwaram Project Inquiry to April 22
Hindustan Times • Apr 9, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



