The Rajasthan High Court has issued a clarificatory order revising its earlier judgment on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026. Initially, the court expressed concerns that the amendment, which replaces self-perceived gender identity with medical certification, diluted constitutional guarantees. However, in the updated judgment, these remarks were removed, and the court reaffirmed that the right to self-identify one's gender is a fundamental aspect of dignity and personal liberty under Articles 14, 15, 16, and 21 of the Indian Constitution. The court highlighted that selfhood should not be treated as a concession but as a right. Furthermore, it directed the Rajasthan government to ensure that any policy frameworks developed in response to the court's directions remain compliant with the existing legal framework as of March 30, 2026. The case arose from a petition by Ganga Kumari, a transgender woman, who sought horizontal reservation for transgender individuals in public employment. The court ruled in her favor, mandating a three percent additional weightage in marks for transgender candidates across all reservation categories until a comprehensive policy is established.