Kejriwal Seeks Judge's Recusal Over Alleged Bias in Delhi Excise Policy Case
‘Attended RSS-linked events four times’: Kejriwal to Delhi HC judge Swarana Kanta Sharma during recusal plea
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
Arvind Kejriwal, leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and former Chief Minister of Delhi, has requested the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma from the Delhi High Court in the excise policy case, citing her attendance at events linked to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) as a source of bias. He argues that the court has treated him and others as guilty despite their discharge.
- 01Kejriwal argues that Justice Sharma's attendance at RSS events raises bias concerns.
- 02He claims the court has treated the accused as guilty despite a discharge order.
- 03Kejriwal cites a previous ruling to support his recusal request.
- 04He highlights the rapid pace of his case compared to others, suggesting political bias.
- 05Kejriwal asserts that findings from the court contradict those of the trial court.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Arvind Kejriwal (former Chief Minister of Delhi and Aam Aadmi Party national convenor) has personally argued for the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma from the Delhi High Court in the ongoing excise policy case. He claims that Justice Sharma's attendance at four events linked to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) raises concerns of bias, stating that it creates an apprehension of not receiving justice. During his arguments, Kejriwal emphasized that the court has treated the accused as 'guilty' despite a discharge order, referencing a previous ruling that supports his plea. He expressed concern over the speed at which his case is progressing compared to others, suggesting that this indicates political bias against opposition parties. Kejriwal also pointed out that the court's observations in previous hearings amounted to judgments, which he believes undermines the fairness of the proceedings. He criticized the court for sticking to earlier findings, which he argued contradict the trial court's conclusions, and raised issues regarding the principles of natural justice in recent orders.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The outcome of this case could influence public perception of judicial impartiality in politically sensitive cases.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe judges should recuse themselves from cases involving political figures?
Connecting to poll...
More about Aam Aadmi Party
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


