A job seeker in their late 30s reported a dramatic increase in interview calls after removing their graduation year from their résumé. This change resulted in a callback rate that tripled, as the individual, with over 15 years of experience, suspected that recruiters were prematurely categorizing them as overqualified or too expensive based on age. The user modified their résumé by excluding graduation dates, retaining only degree and university information, and limiting work experience to the past decade. This strategy sparked a broader conversation about age bias in hiring practices, particularly in the United States, where applicants around age 40 are protected against age discrimination. Some commenters on Reddit supported the strategy as a way to emphasize relevant skills, while others criticized the hiring system for requiring such tactics to avoid bias. The situation raises questions about whether removing older dates is an effective strategy or indicative of deeper issues within the hiring process.