RMIT University Drops Misconduct Case Against Student Criticizing Gaza Involvement
RMIT drops misconduct case against student who accused university of being ‘complicit in Gaza genocide’
The Guardian
Image: The Guardian
RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia, has dropped a misconduct case against student Gemma Seymour, who accused the institution of complicity in genocide due to its ties with weapons companies. Seymour's social media video called for the closure of the university's defence research centre, sparking controversy over freedom of speech and institutional accountability.
- 01RMIT University dropped a misconduct case against student Gemma Seymour.
- 02Seymour accused the university of complicity in genocide related to its defence research ties.
- 03The university cited safety concerns regarding the public identification of its facilities.
- 04Seymour views the case withdrawal as a victory for freedom of speech and protest.
- 05The incident highlights ongoing debates about universities' roles in military supply chains.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
RMIT University, located in Melbourne, Australia, has decided to drop a misconduct case against Gemma Seymour, a fine arts student who accused the institution of being 'complicit in genocide' due to its connections with weapons manufacturers through the Sir Lawrence Wackett Defence and Aerospace Centre. The case was initiated after Seymour posted a video on social media calling for the centre's closure, claiming that RMIT's partnerships with companies like Boeing contribute to violence in Gaza. RMIT had argued that the video posed a safety risk by publicly identifying the centre's location, which is not listed online. However, following a review, the university's student conduct team notified Seymour that the scheduled hearing for April 22, 2026, would not proceed. Seymour celebrated this decision as a victory for the right to criticize military actions and the role of educational institutions in the military supply chain. The incident has sparked broader discussions about freedom of speech and the responsibilities of universities in relation to their affiliations with the defence industry, especially amid ongoing conflicts in Gaza.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The decision to drop the case reinforces the importance of freedom of speech on university campuses, particularly regarding controversial topics like military involvement and institutional accountability.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should universities sever ties with defense contractors?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



