On Thursday, the Supreme Court of India warned that restricting temple access based on caste, belief, or sect could have detrimental effects on Hinduism and society at large. Chief Justice Surya Kant led a nine-judge bench that emphasized the constitutional goal of unity over division, particularly in light of the ongoing Sabarimala case. The court examined the interplay between Article 26, which grants religious denominations the right to manage their affairs, and Article 25(2)(b), which empowers the state to enact social reform laws. Senior advocate CS Vaidyanathan contended that a landmark ruling from 1958, which upheld temple entry laws, was misinterpreted and argued for the independence of Article 26(b). However, the bench expressed concerns about a broad interpretation of denominational autonomy that could lead to exclusionary practices. The court pointed out that Hindu practices often transcend rigid sectarian boundaries, with devotees frequently visiting temples across different communities. Justice Nagarathna highlighted that permitting exclusion could foster division rather than unity. The bench is tasked with answering seven key questions related to essential religious practices and the limits of judicial review in matters of faith.