Maharashtra Educator Vitthal Kangane to Challenge Meta's Instagram Restrictions in Court
‘Attempt to silence my voice’: Maharashtra educator Vitthal Kangane to move HC after Meta restricts his Instagram account in India
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
Vitthal Kangane, a private educator from Parbhani, Maharashtra, plans to file a petition in the Bombay High Court against Meta for restricting his Instagram account in India. He claims this action is an attempt to silence his criticism of the BJP-led government, particularly regarding a controversial figure linked to multiple criminal charges.
- 01Vitthal Kangane's Instagram account was restricted in India following a government notice.
- 02Kangane claims the restriction aims to silence his criticism of the BJP-led Mahayuti government.
- 03He plans to challenge Meta's action in the Bombay High Court.
- 04Kangane's posts often address social and civic issues, amassing a following of 1.7 million.
- 05His legal argument references a significant Supreme Court ruling that struck down vague online censorship laws.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Vitthal Kangane, a private educator from Parbhani district in Maharashtra, has announced his intention to approach the Bombay High Court following restrictions placed on his Instagram account by Meta. Kangane, who has a substantial following of 1.7 million users, believes the action is an attempt to suppress his criticism of the BJP-led Mahayuti government. He recently posted content addressing Ashok Kharat, a self-styled godman facing multiple criminal charges, questioning how Kharat managed to operate without scrutiny for nearly a decade. Kangane stated that instead of restricting his entire account, Meta could have simply removed the specific post in question. Meta has indicated that the restriction was implemented following a valid government blocking order under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which mandates intermediaries to comply with government directives. Kangane plans to argue in court that his posts are not offensive but rather highlight governmental failures, referencing the landmark 2015 Shreya Singhal vs Union of India ruling that deemed certain online censorship laws unconstitutional. He aims to challenge the implications of silencing voices that criticize government actions.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Kangane's legal challenge could set a precedent for freedom of expression on social media platforms in India, especially for critics of the government.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
More about Meta
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




