A recent notification from the Goa government aimed at protecting 15 ancient monuments has ignited a debate over the naming of a 16th-century pillory located in Old Goa. Historians have raised objections to the use of the name 'Hat Katro Khambo' (hand-cutting pillar) in the government's gazette, arguing that it is misleading and lacks historical evidence. They assert that the pillar has always been known as 'Pelourinho Novo' (New Pillory) and served a different purpose than what the new name implies. The Hindu Jagriti Samiti, a right-wing group, supports the name change, linking it to colonial injustices, while historians argue that such claims are unfounded. Researcher Cedric Lobo emphasized that similar structures exist in other former Portuguese colonies and that there is no documented evidence connecting this pillar to the Goa Inquisition, which lasted from 1560 to 1820. The Archaeology Department, represented by Nilesh Fal Dessai, stated that they will review public feedback over the next two months before making a final recommendation to the government. Historians call for a reliance on substantiated facts rather than narratives that could distort historical understanding.