In recent city council meetings in Dunwoody, Georgia, residents have voiced strong opposition to the city’s contract with Flock Safety, a company providing automated license plate readers. Concerns have escalated following a change in Flock's terms of service, which removed assurances about data ownership and privacy. Critics argue that the technology could be misused, especially regarding access by federal agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Flock Safety maintains that it does not sell data and that all images are owned by its customers. However, skepticism persists among residents and some city officials, leading to a deferral of the contract renewal. Similar situations are unfolding in other cities across the United States, with some opting to dismantle Flock cameras while others negotiate new contracts with stricter data-sharing language. The ongoing debate reflects a growing unease about surveillance technology and its potential impact on privacy and civil liberties.