Umar Khalid Requests Open Hearing in Supreme Court for Bail Review in Delhi Riots Case
Umar Khalid seeks open hearing in review against bail refusal in Delhi riot case
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
Umar Khalid, a former student of Jawaharlal Nehru University, is seeking an open court hearing for his review petition challenging the Supreme Court's refusal to grant him bail in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case. His lawyer argued for oral arguments to be heard publicly, citing the serious nature of the allegations against him.
- 01Umar Khalid is challenging the Supreme Court's January 5 bail denial linked to the 2020 Delhi riots.
- 02His lawyer, Kapil Sibal, requested an open court hearing for the review petition.
- 03The Supreme Court previously ruled that Khalid plays a central role in the alleged conspiracy.
- 04Khalid has been in custody since September 2020, while co-accused Sharjeel Imam has been in custody since January 2020.
- 05The court emphasized that prolonged incarceration does not justify bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Umar Khalid, a former student at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), has filed a review petition in the Supreme Court of India, seeking an open court hearing regarding the denial of his bail in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case. On January 5, the Supreme Court denied Khalid bail, citing that he and co-accused Sharjeel Imam played a 'central and formative role' in the alleged conspiracy that led to communal violence in northeast Delhi, resulting in 53 deaths and numerous injuries. Khalid's lawyer, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, argued that the review should be heard publicly rather than in chambers, emphasizing the importance of oral arguments in such serious matters. The Supreme Court's earlier ruling noted that long incarceration alone cannot justify bail under the stringent provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Khalid has been in custody since September 13, 2020, while Imam has been detained since January 28, 2020. The court had previously granted bail to five other co-accused, indicating that not all allegations carry the same weight. Khalid and Imam's case has drawn attention due to the serious nature of the accusations and the implications for their rights to protest.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The outcome of Khalid's bail review could set precedents for similar cases involving protests and charges under the UAPA, affecting the rights of individuals accused in politically sensitive cases.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe that individuals accused under the UAPA should have the right to open court hearings for bail?
Connecting to poll...
More about Supreme Court of India

Umar Khalid Seeks Supreme Court Review of Bail Denial in Delhi Riots Case
The Indian Express • Apr 13, 2026
Amit Shah Campaigns in West Bengal Ahead of 2026 Assembly Elections
The Economic Times • Apr 13, 2026

Parliamentary Inquiry into Justice Varma Continues Despite Resignation
Hindustan Times • Apr 13, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.

