Expert Warns GST 2.0 Inverted Duty Structure Harms FMCG and Pharma Sectors
GST 2.0 Inverted duty structure hurts FMCG, Pharma: Expert flags concerns
The Economic TimesImage: The Economic Times
The inverted duty structure under India's Goods and Services Tax (GST) 2.0 is adversely affecting companies in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) and over-the-counter (OTC) pharmaceutical sectors, according to Sudipta Bhattacharjee, an indirect tax partner at Khaitan & Co. High input-side taxation is leading to significant accumulated credits, which could trigger litigation across various sectors.
- 01Inverted duty structure under GST 2.0 is harming FMCG and OTC pharma sectors.
- 02High input-side taxation on services like marketing leads to accumulated credits.
- 03Removal of GST compensation cess has rendered accumulated credits worthless.
- 04Strict implementation of rules of origin under free trade agreements may discourage businesses.
- 05Complexity in GST compliance remains a challenge, particularly for MSMEs.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Sudipta Bhattacharjee, an indirect tax partner at Khaitan & Co, has raised concerns about the inverted duty structure resulting from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) 2.0 regime, particularly affecting companies in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) and over-the-counter (OTC) pharmaceutical sectors. The high input-side taxation on services such as marketing, which incurs an 18% GST, is leading to significant accumulated credits that companies cannot reclaim. Bhattacharjee highlighted the removal of the GST compensation cess, which has turned previously valuable accumulated credits into unusable assets, potentially impacting the profit and loss statements of affected companies. This issue could also lead to widespread litigation, as industry bodies, including automobile dealers, have already approached the Supreme Court for resolution. Additionally, Bhattacharjee expressed concerns about the implementation of rules of origin under the Customs (Administration of Rules of Origin under Trade Agreements) Rules, known as CAROTAR, which may create friction and delays for businesses seeking preferential tariff benefits. While acknowledging improvements in GST compliance due to digitization, he noted that the system remains complex, especially for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Bhattacharjee also discussed the broader implications of global trade dynamics, emphasizing the need for a return to a rules-based international order.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The inverted duty structure and removal of GST compensation cess could lead to financial losses for FMCG and OTC pharma companies, affecting their profitability and potentially leading to job cuts.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the GST 2.0 regime needs immediate reforms?
Connecting to poll...
More about Khaitan & Co
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.





