NCLAT Hears Dispute Over Bidding Process in Jaiprakash Associates Insolvency Case
Vedanta was never formally declared as highest bidder for JAL: RP to NCLAT
Business Standard
Image: Business Standard
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) was informed that Vedanta was never officially declared the highest bidder in the insolvency proceedings of Jaiprakash Associates Ltd (JAL). The resolution professional argued that Vedanta's claims lack legal basis, emphasizing the Committee of Creditors' comprehensive evaluation process.
- 01Vedanta was not formally recognized as the highest bidder for Jaiprakash Associates Ltd.
- 02The Committee of Creditors utilized a scoring model combining financial and qualitative assessments.
- 03Vedanta's attempt to revise its bid post-closure was deemed impermissible.
- 04The Adani Group's resolution plan was approved with 93.8% support from the Committee of Creditors.
- 05Vedanta argues that its bid offered greater value than Adani's, which was lower than JAL's liquidation estimate.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
During a hearing at the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), the resolution professional (RP) for Jaiprakash Associates Ltd (JAL) stated that Vedanta was never officially declared the highest bidder in the ongoing insolvency proceedings. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing the RP, clarified that a September 5, 2025, email merely indicated the highest financial figure from the bidding process, not an official winning bid. He highlighted that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) evaluated bids based on a composite framework, emphasizing both financial and qualitative parameters. Vedanta's claim of being denied the chance to match Adani Enterprises' offer was countered by Singhvi, who pointed out that bid conditions prohibited revisions after the challenge process closed. The CoC had approved Adani's resolution plan, valued at ₹14,535 crore (approximately $1.75 billion USD), with 93.8% voting support, despite JAL's liquidation value being estimated at ₹15,799.53 crore (around $1.9 billion USD). Vedanta contended that its proposal of ₹17,926 crore (approximately $2.16 billion USD) was superior and would have maximized value for creditors. The NCLAT has scheduled further hearings on this matter.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The outcome of this case could significantly affect creditor recoveries and the future of Jaiprakash Associates Ltd, impacting jobs and local economies dependent on the company.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the bidding process for Jaiprakash Associates Ltd was fair?
Connecting to poll...
More about Jaiprakash Associates Ltd
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


