Madras High Court Issues Notice to Income Tax Department Over Allegations Against Udhayanidhi Stalin
HC notice to I-T, Centre over plea alleging gaps in Udhayanidhi’s papers
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
The Madras High Court has directed the Income Tax department and the Union government to respond to allegations of discrepancies in Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's financial disclosures for the upcoming 2026 State Assembly elections. The petition claims irregularities in asset declarations and a significant rise in income.
- 01The Madras High Court has issued notices to the Income Tax department and the Union government.
- 02Allegations include discrepancies in Udhayanidhi Stalin's financial disclosures for the 2026 elections.
- 03The petition highlights missing assets and unexplained variations in loans.
- 04Udhayanidhi's reported income increased significantly, raising concerns about transparency.
- 05The court has set a deadline for responses by April 20, ahead of the elections.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Madras High Court has issued notices to the Income Tax department and the Union Ministry of Corporate Affairs regarding a petition that alleges irregularities in the financial disclosures of Udhayanidhi Stalin, the Deputy Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, for the 2026 State Assembly elections. The petition, filed by R Kumaravel, a voter from the Chepauk–Triplicane Assembly constituency in Chennai, claims that a comparison of Udhayanidhi's election affidavits from 2021 and 2026 reveals serious discrepancies. Kumaravel's counsel pointed out that several assets previously declared have seemingly disappeared, including an investment of ₹7.36 crore (approximately $885,000 USD) in the film production company Red Giant Movies, which is not reflected in the latest affidavit. Instead, the 2026 affidavit lists an investment of ₹2.63 crore (approximately $316,000 USD) in the same company under Udhayanidhi's spouse's name without any explanation for the changes. Additionally, the petition raises concerns about a sharp increase in Udhayanidhi's income, which reportedly rose from ₹2.02 crore (approximately $243,000 USD) over five years to over ₹10.98 crore (approximately $1.32 million USD) in subsequent years, questioning the correlation with declared assets. Kumaravel argues that these inaccurate disclosures violate the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and undermine voters' rights to information. The court has directed the respondents to file their replies by April 20, 2023, ahead of the elections scheduled for April 23, 2023.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The outcome of this inquiry could affect the transparency of electoral processes and the integrity of candidates' financial disclosures in Tamil Nadu.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe financial disclosures by political candidates should be more strictly regulated?
Connecting to poll...
More about Income Tax Department
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




