Jury Rules Live Nation and Ticketmaster Operate an Illegal Monopoly
Live Nation and Ticketmaster found to be an illegal monopoly by jury in antitrust trial
The Independent
Image: The Independent
A federal jury in Manhattan has found Live Nation and its subsidiary Ticketmaster guilty of operating a monopoly over concert venues, stifling competition and inflating ticket prices. The lawsuit, backed by multiple U.S. states, highlighted internal communications revealing questionable practices within the company.
- 01The jury's verdict marks a significant legal setback for Live Nation and Ticketmaster.
- 02The lawsuit was initiated by the U.S. federal government and numerous states, accusing the companies of monopolistic practices.
- 03Live Nation controls approximately 86% of the concert market and 73% of the overall ticketing market.
- 04Internal messages from Live Nation executives revealed unethical attitudes towards customers.
- 05The case reflects ongoing scrutiny of ticketing practices and competition in the live entertainment industry.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
A federal jury has ruled that Live Nation Entertainment and its subsidiary, Ticketmaster, operate an illegal monopoly over major concert venues, significantly impacting competition and ticket prices. The verdict was reached after four days of deliberation in a Manhattan court and is part of a broader lawsuit initiated by the U.S. federal government and several states. Live Nation, which owns, operates, and has equity interests in hundreds of venues, was accused of using its market dominance to block venues from working with multiple ticket vendors, thereby limiting consumer choice. The trial featured testimony from Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino, who faced scrutiny over the company's handling of the 2022 Taylor Swift ticket sales incident, which he attributed to a cyberattack. Internal communications from executive Benjamin Baker, which described customers in derogatory terms and acknowledged inflated prices, further fueled the case against the company. The lawsuit argues that Live Nation's practices have led to higher ticket prices for consumers. Although Live Nation defended its position by claiming its size is a result of success and not monopolistic behavior, the jury's decision marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate about competition in the live entertainment sector. The case has historical roots, with previous complaints against the company dating back to the 1990s. Despite a federal settlement that included some concessions, over 30 states chose to pursue the trial, believing the agreement did not adequately address the monopolistic practices alleged against Live Nation.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The ruling could lead to increased competition in the ticketing industry, potentially resulting in lower prices for consumers and more options for venues.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe Live Nation and Ticketmaster should be broken up?
Connecting to poll...
More about Live Nation Entertainment

Live Nation e Ticketmaster enfrentam condenação por monopólio no setor de shows nos EUA
G1 - O Portal • Apr 16, 2026

US Jury Rules Live Nation and Ticketmaster Operate a Monopoly
The Guardian • Apr 16, 2026

Live Nation enfrenta juicio por prácticas monopólicas en la venta de entradas
El Pais • Apr 16, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




